|
The Immanuel Beit Yaakov controversy concerns the founding of a Hasidic girls' school in the town and settlement of Immanuel in September 2007. A Shas Sephardi girls' school, "Ohel Rachel VeLeah", was also founded in Immanuel in September 2007.〔 Although the Hasidic school was founded and attended by members of both the Sephardi and Ashkenazi communities,〔 with Rav Shimon Ba'adani as final Rabbinic authority,〔 the Hasidic school was sued by Yoav Lallum, who does not reside in Immanuel,〔 and his group "Noar KeHalacha", with assistance from the New Israel Fund〔 〔https://web.archive.org/web/20100510014240/http://www.nif.org/issue-areas/stories/court-orders-emmanuel.html〕 〔https://web.archive.org/web/20110817081551/http://www.nif.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=99〕 〔//web.archive.org/web/20100905145530/http://www.nif.org/issue-areas/stories/court-orders-emmanuel.html〕 and the "Tmura" and "Achoti" organizations;〔 the allegation—that this was solely an ethnic split between Sephardim and Ashkenazim.〔〔 Attorney Mordechai Bass was sent by the Ministry of Education in January 2008 to investigate the allegations of discrimination. Bass concluded: "I am convinced that there is no ethnic discrimination....When ethnic discrimination actually occurs, we must combat it with all our might. I express my sorrow about complaints like these - thrown in the air - that increase hatred among Israel, and are totally baseless."〔(Bass report )〕 In June 2010, the fathers of the girls who attend the Hasidic school, one-third of whom are Sephardi,〔(The Haredi World's New Heroes )〕 were jailed by the Israeli Supreme Court without a trial. There was no hearing, no cross-examination of palintiffs or defendants.〔(tragedy of sentencing error )〕 They were released before the end of their sentence when large-scale protests against what was alleged to be an inhumane and illegal incarceration swept the country. Secular journalist Nahum Barnea described the court decision as one "made not from the heart, nor from the head, but rather from the belly". Understanding the expansion of power of the Israeli Supreme Court in the 1990s assists in understanding the Immanuel Beit Yaakov topic. "The Supreme Court...operates under Aharon Barak's dictum that the Court can hear a case brought by anyone about anything — unlike most countries, such as the US, where a person has to be affected by something in order to bring it to court." 〔(Cross-Currents: Emanuel: Further Reading )〕 Attorney Aviad Visoli argues that the fact that the Israel Supreme Court held no hearing renders the court's decision illegal. "Each parent should have had a separate trial and been able to give testimony. They were not granted their day in court, not in actuality, not under the law."〔(Tragedy of sentencing error )〕 The Sephardi parents of the Hasidic school had presented an emergency appeal to appear before the Supreme Court. They point out that every family was invited to apply.〔() Invitation to apply to either the original or Hasidic Beit Yaakov〕 Their request to appear before the court was denied. The court has since approved a separate school for the Haredi girls in the 2010–2011 academic year, albeit without funding. ==Incident== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Immanuel Beit Yaakov controversy」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|